Reading and discuss the famous dialogues where Socrates stands accused of corrupting the youth of Athens.
- Six weekly small-group sessions suitable for beginners
- Read a set passage before the evening talk and discussion
- All readings from The Last Days of Socrates
(purchase e.g. here, or order when you enrol)
- No experience necessary, just a curious mind.
BOOK NOW FOR ONLINE CLASSES DURING OUR TWILIGHT SESSIONS
Tuesday nights from 10 Nov 2020, 6:30 – 8pm (Eastern Australian time)
All readings are from three of Plato’s dialogues: Apology, Euthyphro and Phaedo.
First Session | Philosophy, Scepticism and Wisdom | Apology page 20c to 23e
Convicted of corrupting the youth with impieties, Socrates’ trial defence is a classic of philosophical scepticism.
Why is scepticism preparatory to philosophical inquiry? What is meant by ‘divine wisdom’?
Second Session | What is Justice? | Euthyphro (complete)
Back before his trial, Socrates falls into discussion with his friend, a theologian, about the nature of ‘piety’. This classic (and infuriating!) demonstration of Socratic inquiry shifts to the grander question of ‘justice’.
We all know what justice means…or do we?
Third Session | Body & Soul | Phaedo page 60b to 69e
It’s dawn in prison on Socrates’ last day and he is arguing that bodily emotions and senses distract from the absolute and insensible reality of justice, beauty, equality, etc. The ensuing arguments for the soul’s immortality informed Christianity on a topic found deficient in the Bible.
Why do true philosophers lose their fear of death?
Fourth Session | The other side of Things | Phaedo page 70a to 79e
In building the case for immortality, Socrates argues that all generation proceeds from opposite to opposite. Platonic opposites (pleasure/pain, equal/unequal, greater/smaller) are complete unto themselves in their very opposition.
Can you think of some other Platonic opposites? In what sense are they boundless?
Fifth Session | The absolute reality of ‘Forms’ | Phaedo page 84c to 100a
As death approaches, the ‘proof’ of immortality is presented with powerful challenges, which raises the question of whether the discursive method can be trusted when seeking truth.
If an interest in the outcome of an inquiry obstructs the pursuit of truth, is Socrates disinterested on the subject of immortality?
Sixth Session | What is Platonism? | Phaedo page 100c to 105e
In a renewed defence of immortality, Socrates explains how sensible realities come to be through ‘participation’ in absolute Forms.
The final winning argument for immortality may not win you, but what is this vision of reality that will come to be known as Platonic?